About your Search

20130115
20130123
Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1
need further clarity that i am protected within the law. as i have said, the 1861 defenses against the person act 's tilt stands. the supreme court's judgment has not been legislated for, even though it is over 20 years since that judgment. it is open to a degree of interpretation. it is not supported by legislation. please be real short, we are asking for legislation that is broad enough to allow us to do our jobs, but we also want regulation. we want this process to be monitored. in all of our opinions, i believe, we need board legislation to allow us to do our job. this should be regulated in the patient's interest. society can be sure that we act appropriately at all times, and only to save the mother's life. it is part of all the steps but for that we would monitor terminations of pregnancy in order to save a life. we can be very clear that all decisions to do so are appropriate and according to the wishes of our society, to reserve life. we are about saving women's life. it is not about terminating pregnancy or destroying babies. it is about saving women's life. the cost of t
Search Results 0 to 0 of about 1

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)